The 2010 version of Peanut Rx has been released by researchers and Extension specialists at the University of Georgia, University of Florida and Auburn University. Changes to the risk index, based on observations and data from the 2009 season, can be found in the cultivar/variety section.
Because of the number of new varieties available in seed quantity enough for planting larger acreages, producers are reminded to see where those varieties fit into the index, even if the variety offers an improved disease resistance package.
Variety Selection Is One Factor
“The first question is about varieties,” says James Hadden, technical support representative for Syngenta Crop Protection, “and growers need to be aware of where their variety is in the risk model.
“There are some new varieties that can help some growers in terms of reducing their fungicide input, but that’s part of the total package. They need to look at all the factors.”
Syngenta Crop Protection was the first company to tailor a prescription program using Peanut Rx.
Bob Kemerait, University of Georgia Extension plant pathologist, says “Syngenta was the first to come out and say, if you follow Peanut Rx and find that you are at low risk, we have a four-spray program for you. If you are at high risk, we have a seven-spray program for you.”
More Companies Establish Programs
“In 2009, there was Syngenta with Abound, Nichino with Artisan and Convoy, Arysta Life Science with Evito and BASF with Headline,” Kemerait says. “In less than five years, we have had crop protection companies with seven-spray programs to now say ‘if you manage your crop well, show us the reduced risk, we’ll work with you to spray fewer times.’”
The Benefit Of Good Management
Kemerait says the Peanut Rx prescription fungicide program is based on putting the right amount of fungicide into a field based on risk.
“If you have a high risk from short rotations, growing soybeans, less resistant varieties, you need to spray at least seven times, and with a wet year like we had last year, eight or nine times may be needed to maintain yields.
“But if you’ve got good rotation, resistant varieties, good management, you may be able to get away with only four or five sprays,” he says. “The important thing is that the prescription program is a tangible way to benefit from using good management.”
Look At Different Scenarios
“What’s neat about the index is that you can go along and play ‘what if’ scenarios in terms of risk management,” Hadden says.
Besides the factors pointed out on the disease risk index, other factors, such as weed management, can play a role in disease management.
“Good weed control affects your ability to manage diseases,” Hadden says. “If weeds are intercepting the fungicides, it will decrease your level of control.”
Looking at the total package for peanut production, hopefully producers can continue to keep disease problems to a minimum and reduce input costs with good management. PG
| Variety selection |
| |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| Variety |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| AP-4 |
20 |
20 |
15 |
unknown |
| AT 3085RO |
15 |
30 |
25 |
unknown |
| C-99R |
20 |
15 |
15 |
25 |
| Florida-07 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
unknown |
| Georgia Green |
30 |
20 |
25 |
15 |
| Georgia Greener |
15 |
20 |
20 |
unknown |
| Georgia-O3L |
15 |
15 |
10 |
20 |
| Georgia-02C |
15 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
| Georgia-05E |
15 |
20 |
25 |
unknown |
| Georgia-01R |
10 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
| York |
10 |
10 |
5 |
unknown |
| Georgia-07W, Tifguard |
10 |
15 |
10 |
unknown |
| Georgia-06G |
10 |
25 |
25 |
|
| |
| Crop rotation with non-legume crop |
Years Between
Peanut Crop |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| 0 |
NA |
25 |
25 |
20 |
| 1 |
NA |
15 |
20 |
15 |
| 2 |
NA |
10 |
10 |
10 |
| 3 or more |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
| |
| Tillage |
| Tillage |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| conventional |
15 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
| reduced |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| |
| Field History |
Previous disease
problems in the field? |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| No |
NA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Yes |
NA |
10 |
15 |
10 |
| |
| Irrigation |
Does the field
receive irrigation? |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| No |
NA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Yes |
NA |
10 |
5 |
10 |
| |
| Planting Date |
| Peanuts are planted: |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| Prior to May 1 |
30 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
| May 1 to May 10 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
| May 11 to May 31 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| June 1 to June 10 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
| After June 10 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
| |
| Row pattern |
| Peanuts are planted in: |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| Single rows |
15 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
| Twin rows |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Plant population (final stand, not seeding rate) |
| Peanuts are planted in: |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| Less than 3 plants per foot |
25 |
NA |
0 |
NA |
| 3 to 4 plants per foot |
15 |
NA |
0 |
NA |
| More than 4 plants per foot |
5 |
NA |
5 |
NA |
| |
| At-Plant Insecticide |
| Insecticide Used |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| None |
15 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| Other than Thimet 20G or Phorate 20G |
15 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| Thimet 20G, Phorate 20G |
5 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| |
| Classic Herbicide |
| Classic Herbicide Usage |
Spotted Wilt
Points |
Leaf Spot Points |
Soilborne Disease Points |
| |
|
|
White mold |
Limb rot |
| Classic Applied |
5 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| No Classic Applied |
0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|

For each risk index factor, identify the option that best describes the situation in your field. Not all varieties are listed. To view the complete 2010 Peanut Rx, visit the University of Georgia peanut Web site at www.ugapeanuts.com.
Calculate Your Risk
|
| |
Spotted Wilt |
Leaf Spot |
White Mold |
Rhizoctonia Limb Rot |
| Variety selection |
|
|
|
|
| Crop rotation |
|
|
|
|
| Tillage |
|
|
|
|
| Field history |
|
|
|
|
| Irrigation |
|
|
|
|
| Planting date |
|
|
|
|
| Row pattern |
|
|
|
|
| Plant population |
|
|
|
|
| At-plant insecticide |
|
|
|
|
| Classic herbicide |
|
|
|
|
Interpret Your Index Values
|
| |
Spotted
Wilt |
Leaf
Spot |
White
Mold |
Limb
Rot |
| Low Risk |
< 65 |
10-35 |
10-25 |
15-25 |
| Moderate Risk |
70 -110 |
40-60 |
30-50 |
30-40 |
| High Risk |
>115 |
65-100 |
55-80 |
45-75 |
In a year when tomato spotted wilt virus incidence is high statewide or in your region, even fields with low risk level may experience significant losses. Consider the following recommendations to reduce your spotted wilt risk level:
• Use less susceptible varieties.
• Adjust planting date.
• Consult the complete Peanut Rx™ for additional options that may also provide limited benefit. |
A Few Notes About Risk Levels
When weather conditions are favorable for fungal diseases, especially when rainfall is abundant, even fields at initial “low risk” to fungal diseases may become “high risk.”
If high risk is indicated, growers should use a full fungicide input program.
For medium-risk fields, growers can expect better performance from standard fungicide programs. Reduced-fungicide programs in research studies have been successfully implemented when conditions are not favorable for disease spread.
For low-risk fields, producers have made management decisions that offer maximum benefit for reducing the potential for severe disease. These fields are candidates for modified disease management programs with a reduced number of fungicide applications.

|
|